From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec  5 08:22:36 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A1216A41F
	for <freebsd-rc@freebsd.org>; Mon,  5 Dec 2005 08:22:36 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mail2.fluidhosting.com [204.14.90.12])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4292343D55
	for <freebsd-rc@freebsd.org>; Mon,  5 Dec 2005 08:22:36 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (qmail 62035 invoked by uid 399); 5 Dec 2005 08:22:35 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.5?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1)
	by localhost with SMTP; 5 Dec 2005 08:22:35 -0000
Message-ID: <4393F8CA.4010904@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:22:34 -0800
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051203)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Andrey V. Semyonov" <wilfre@tcom.ru>
References: <4393EDBF.5010609@tcom.ru>
In-Reply-To: <4393EDBF.5010609@tcom.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Adding /usr/local/etc/rc.d to the base rcorder
X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation."
	<freebsd-rc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-rc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-rc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:22:36 -0000

Andrey V. Semyonov wrote:
> I apologise for wrong PR-group that a PR was sended to, but it seems to 
> be very strange that no attantion was made to it at all. And, I continue 
> to suppose that the PR's way to `rcorder` scripts via localpkg is more 
> simple (and works fine as I tested) that offered by Doug Barton.

Thanks for bringing this PR to my attention, I just closed it in order to 
help keep the PR database neat and clean. :)

Seriously though, the clamor for a more general approach (that allows local 
scripts to be included in the overall rcorder) has been loud and long, and 
there is no reason we can't overcome the barriers to make it happen.

Doug

-- 

     This .signature sanitized for your protection