From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 4 16:16:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 10CBE16A4E5; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:16:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: perforce@freebsd.org Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C437516A4DD; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:16:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flag@newluxor.wired.org) Received: from mail.oltrelinux.com (krisma.oltrelinux.com [194.242.226.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE12D43D58; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:16:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flag@newluxor.wired.org) Received: from newluxor.wired.org (ip-115-167.sn1.eutelia.it [62.94.115.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.oltrelinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7628211B25B; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:16:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from flag@localhost) by newluxor.wired.org (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) id k74GEbBX016811; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:14:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from flag) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:14:37 +0200 From: Paolo Pisati To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20060804161437.GC1205@tin.it> References: <200608041457.k74EvpSw097626@repoman.freebsd.org> <200608041143.26838.jhb@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200608041143.26838.jhb@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at krisma.oltrelinux.com Cc: Perforce Change Reviews , Paolo Pisati Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 103173 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:16:20 -0000 On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 11:43:26AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > In that case you can't call it while holding the BFE_LOCK. > You probably only > need the BFE_LOCK around bfe_stop(). Right, else it will deadlock, thanks. -- Paolo Piso's first law: nothing works as expected!