From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 5 23:43:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE2016A401 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 23:43:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (smtp5-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3372F13C4BB for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 23:43:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (tataz.chchile.org [82.233.239.98]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E79D7D5C for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 00:43:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from obiwan.tataz.chchile.org (unknown [192.168.1.25]) by tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114D29EF18 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 23:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obiwan.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E438D405F; Tue, 6 Mar 2007 00:45:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 00:45:04 +0100 From: Jeremie Le Hen To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20070305234504.GC2479@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <20070305233008.GA2479@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070305233008.GA2479@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: Subject: Re: Wrong behaviour with stacked mounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 23:43:20 -0000 Sorry, forgot a few details, On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:30:08AM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > Whilst the current shell current directory vnode (I'm not sure I'm > totally right here) is still the lower mount point (/dev/ad0s5), > umount(8) refuses to umount the upper mount point. Of course, I meant that: 1) Performing ls(1) in the current shell shows the content of the lower mount point. 2) Performing the same commands with the shell standing elsewhere (say /mnt), it is possible to umount the upper mount point. -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >