From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 29 19:15:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEFA116A4DA; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:15:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=julian=38983aa42@elischer.org) Received: from a50.ironport.com (a50.ironport.com [63.251.108.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D77343D73; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:15:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from prvs=julian=38983aa42@elischer.org) Received: from unknown (HELO [10.251.18.229]) ([10.251.18.229]) by a50.ironport.com with ESMTP; 29 Aug 2006 12:15:12 -0700 Message-ID: <44F4923F.8040708@elischer.org> Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:15:11 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060414 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: .@babolo.ru References: <1156841866.178399.7168.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru> In-Reply-To: <1156841866.178399.7168.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Net , Doug Barton Subject: Re: possible patch for implementing split DNS X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:15:14 -0000 .@babolo.ru wrote: >[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > > >>Julian Elischer wrote: >> >> >>>I need some processes to look elsewhere for DNS information from where >>>the rest of the system looks.. This patch seems to me a simple solution. >>>We over-ride where the resolver looks for resolv.conf using an >>>environment variable. This would allow me to reset this to an application >>>specific config file that specifies a different server. >>> >>>Anyone got better ways fo doing this? >>> >>> >>Run the special processes in a jail with its own resolv.conf? My gut >>reaction to your suggestion is negative, but I'm having a hard time >>articulating a solid reason why. >> >>Perhaps if you described your problem in more detail, it would be easier to >>work around it, but I can't help thinking that there are better ways to >>solve this problem. >> >> >I can describe another problem. >shell computer for many groups of users, >each of it want to use own "search" >and probably "nameserver". > > definitly!