From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Oct 19 13:39:18 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D921A16A4BF
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 19 Oct 2003 13:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E6F43FDD
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 19 Oct 2003 13:39:18 -0700 (PDT)	(envelope-from ps@mu.org)
Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 214022ED441; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 13:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 13:39:18 -0700
From: Paul Saab <ps@mu.org>
To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
Message-ID: <20031019203918.GA56974@elvis.mu.org>
References: <3F919CA9.F99EA2F0@cs.princeton.edu>
	<20031018173800.B706@odysseus.silby.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031018173800.B706@odysseus.silby.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
cc: Yaoping Ruan <yruan@cs.princeton.edu>
Subject: Re: High mem (4GB) support on FreeBSD 4.8
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 20:39:19 -0000

Mike Silbersack (silby@silby.com) wrote:
> Some of the kernel autoscaling values may be off with 4GB machines; I
> believe that this has been fixed with 4.9, so running 4.9-RC3 might be the
> easiest answer.

Yes, there are issues at exactly 4GB which were fixed at USENIX in
san antonio.