From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 15 06:38:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB9B16A4CE for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 06:38:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81EF543D46 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 06:38:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from beta.home (ppp139-232.lns1.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.139.232])i3FDc9Zq014170 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:08:09 +0930 (CST) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:08:08 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200404152308.08658.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Subject: kmail date headers translated to local time. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 13:38:12 -0000 I have just upgraded to FreeBSD 4.9 Release and also installed a later version (3.1.4) of kde. I don't use the kde windows manager, I have it installed mainly for kmail. On this new version I find the Date/Time in the headers gets translated to my local Date/Time which I find something of a disaster -- I like to know what the author's clock said! If I really want to know the translated time it was always available in the Messages window. When I found that I could customise the date display to include the time zone offset from UTC I thought my problem was solved. But, alas, it still showed my local time with my time zone offset which to me seems quite rediculous -- after all I know MY time zone offset. Is there some way I can switch this back to the earlier behaviour? I know I can get it back by displaying "all headers"; but this is a rather unsatisfactory extreme. It seems that many modern applications for unix are trying to catch up with MS-windows negative features. Fortunately they still have some way to go! Malcolm