From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Nov 13 23:59: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867FE37B401 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:59:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8D043E6E for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:59:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from owt.com (owt-207-41-94-232.owt.com [207.41.94.232]) by rutger.owt.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA10129; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:57:48 -0800 Message-ID: <3DD3577B.5010501@owt.com> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:57:47 -0800 From: Kent Stewart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-mx MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bsdterm@HotPOP.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make buildkernel says device atapicam is unknown!!?? References: <200211132359.26336.bsdterm@HotPOP.com> <3DD34D9B.3010807@owt.com> <200211140144.18808.bsdterm@HotPOP.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG E.S. wrote: > Well, 4.7-RELEASE was released before Nov. 1, 2002 (on Oct. 10). As I > understand it, 4.7-RELEASE is can be obtained by cvsup'ing to RELENG_4_7 (and > generally the only patches that are applied to -RELEASE are security > patches)... whereas if I cvsup'd to RELENG_4, *then* I would be getting > 4.7-STABLE. > > But because I'm cvsup'ing to RELENG_4_7, not RELENG_4, I'm getting > 4.7-RELEASE, not -STABLE... right? > Yes, and I missed the _7. > I may be wrong there; feel free to correct me if I am... :) > > In any case, I tried building the kernel before applying those patches, and > after applying them. The output I quoted earlier is the same either way... I don't have any way to test what you are doing. My systems are all various dates of 4.7-stable. You have all of the security advisories that require rebuilding your system. Have you thought about trying 4.7-stable? It would have everything and the atapicam. Kent > > -ES > > > On Thursday 14 November 2002 01:15 am, Kent Stewart wrote: > >>E.S. wrote: >> >>>I figured out my make buildworld problem I mentioned earlier (I'd >>>uncommented NO_OPENSSL=true in my make.conf - big mistake!), and now that >>>world builds OK, I'm having kernel build problems. >>> >>>I'm building 4.7-RELEASE (cvsup'ing to RELENG_4_7), and here's all the >>>output for "make buildkernel KERNCONF=KERNELCONF4": >>> >>>-------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>>>>>Kernel build for KERNELCONF4 started on Wed Nov 13 23:45:17 CST 2002 >>>>> >>>-------------------------------------------------------------- >>>===> KERNELCONF4 >>>mkdir -p /usr/obj/usr/src/sys >>>cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf; >>>PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/bin:/usr/ob >>>j/usr/src/i386/usr/games:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin config -d >>>/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KERNELCONF4 KERNELCONF4 >>>Don't forget to do a ``make depend'' >>>Warning: device "atapicam" is unknown >>>*** Error code 1 >>> >>>Stop in /usr/src. >>>*** Error code 1 >>> >>>Stop in /usr/src. >>> >>> >>>I've applied the following of Thomas Cuivre's atapicam patches (from >>>http://www.cuivre.fr.eu.org/~thomas/atapicam/): >>> >>>atapicam-20021031.diff >>>atapicam-STABLE-config-20021031.diff >>> >>>...to source I cvsup'd today (Nov. 13). But I've had this same make >>>error for the last several days... >>> >>>I have all the necessary devices and options in my KERNELCONF4 file that >>>Cuivre notes on his atapicam page that we need, but the above is still my >>>output. >>> >>>I *can* comment out "device atapicam" in my config file -- and the kernel >>>appears to build OK (I haven't tried building a full kernel without >>>atapicam support, I've only tested to see if removing "device atapicam" >>>from the config file makes a difference) if I do that, but I really don't >>>want to lose ATAPI burning support using cdrecord, etc... >>> >>>Anybody know what's going on here? Suggestions? >>> >>>I would post my KERNELCONF4 file, but this list cuts off my messages when >>>they're some 200KB+ in size (I know, for bandwidth and spam, etc.)... >> >>I don't understand why you are doing part of this. The web page says >>the atapicam device has been in 4.7-stable source since 1-nov-2002. It >>sounds like you have basically applied the patch twice. All I did was >>add "device atapicam" after my atapicd like so >> >>device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives >>device atapicam >>device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives >> >>and did a make buildkernel. The kernel built without any errors. >> >>Kent > > > > > . > -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message