From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Wed Feb 1 21:50:15 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C276CCBB4D; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 21:50:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09D6C1215; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 21:50:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1cZ2n1-000Ifb-5k; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 00:50:07 +0300 Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 00:50:07 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: Mark Linimon Cc: John Baldwin , "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" , src-committers , Warner Losh , Takahashi Yoshihiro Subject: Re: svn commit: r312910 - in head: . etc/etc.pc98 etc/rc.d lib/libsysdecode libexec release release/doc release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/hardware release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/readme release/doc/share/example... Message-ID: <20170201215007.GA37974@zxy.spb.ru> References: <201701280222.v0S2MFSR022477@repo.freebsd.org> <3458844.3oruRKbrzH@ralph.baldwin.cx> <20170201103555.GA79121@zxy.spb.ru> <12386326.7GSpFTXsMZ@ralph.baldwin.cx> <20170201170950.GF79121@zxy.spb.ru> <20170201213956.GA3765@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170201213956.GA3765@lonesome.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 21:50:15 -0000 On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 03:39:57PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:09:50PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > Also, I am think current ports don't build on 4.x. > > I will personally guarantee, in writing, that current ports do not build > on 4.x, nor have they done so for years. I personally removed the legacy > cruft when 4.11 finally went EOL. > > > I am got complains about using ports on 8.x. > > I am 99% certain that ports will not work on either 8.x or 9.x. Legacy > cruft was removed at the EOL in each of those cases. > > Anyone who think that we can support ports on 4.x, 5.x, 6.x, 7.x, 8.x, > 9.x, 10.x, 11.x, and -current, all at the same time, needs to seek medical > attention at once. At the absolute least, that era spans 3 major versions > of make(1) and two completely different package implementations. I am assume no problem to use new make on old system. May be posible use pkg too (not sure about pkg requirements to syscalls).