From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Aug 2 9:49:42 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FB614FA1; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 09:49:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA87711; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 10:49:06 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id KAA06917; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 10:49:11 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199908021649.KAA06917@harmony.village.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Subject: Re: Mentioning RFC numbers in /etc/services Cc: Sheldon Hearn , John-Mark Gurney , hackers@FreeBSD.org, committers@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: Your message of "02 Aug 1999 13:19:01 +0200." References: <79161.933592574@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Date: Mon, 02 Aug 1999 10:49:11 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: : Allow me to re-quote the message I answered: : : > I vote for allowing inetd.conf to specify a port number instead of a : > service name... I've said it before, and I'll say it again: This is an excellent idea! Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message