From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 24 16:25:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1241065693 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:25:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh.carroll@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2228FC27 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:25:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh.carroll@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so442016ywe.13 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:25:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=HOiofCR9bzq1YxsTggRHPwqnIWgIAZRawRtJ/15S/x0=; b=kRjzKaQPj+JthjYQD91n+B+VSk99eL23wn8bwjW9JSB0O6jB/C85HhCJ+XBnnA35/h dHqajIoSZ3FIcAOjGXjnB8rWcd8YEMK4v7gFdl4LkaE7JMxjeKo6gLIbJOANivXb+OZS KrmJHm8G9Hmi76HE5dO8xV1AdVOZf2L7qbeAI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:references; b=xNkXUqXusNgghji3Pq5Tg7dtgi8SQgNVdsGXtGVOVdtAfQcAyXdPK/Wvrn9hDFmYB8 Ud+PwF6kS3JiKzKJkLmO9k88wBV1V+f2AznDErNLbTm/pztz3h7beeUJscl7WS7Ag4lt 666z2Co4sP9LPg5Ki3RzA7jYq+1pASuDCM/rQ= Received: by 10.151.10.7 with SMTP id n7mr11292769ybi.139.1222273548539; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:25:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.11.21 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:25:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8cb6106e0809240925i5d7ad067o21cc680bd800cc9f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:25:48 -0400 From: "Josh Carroll" To: "Wesley Shields" In-Reply-To: <20080924160633.GC30745@atarininja.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <8cb6106e0809240828v3ebe1095w898597fea2d40272@mail.gmail.com> <20080924160633.GC30745@atarininja.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new reconfig-recursive target for ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: josh.carroll@gmail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:25:49 -0000 > Seems like a rare case where someone would want to re-visit (in this > manner) options they have already set. That said, it may come in handy. Yeah, I figured it can't *hurt* and might come in handy in a few circumstances. > I think "config-recursive-unconditional" would be a better name as it > fits better with the "config-recursive" target. Of course, this is just > a bikeshed argument so I don't care what it ends up being called. ;) I originally named the target config-recursive-force, but the name can be whatever is most appropriate of course. :) Josh