From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Thu Dec 10 09:34:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09189D6F49 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:34:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E162C181B for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:34:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tBA9YJeR038268 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:34:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192014] getaddrinfo(3) broken in jail on loopback Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:34:18 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: borja@codigo23.net X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:34:20 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192014 --- Comment #9 from Francisco de Borja Lopez Rio --- Because it is handy when you have a system with a number of local-only Jails. You give them addresses in the 127.0.0.0 range and then you use PF (or whatever) to redirect traffic there if needed. I've doing that for quite a while, until I hit this bug^feature. If it is indeed the expected behaviour, maybe a note about it should be added to the Jails docs, to prevent people from assigning jails addresses in that range. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.