From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 15 20:09:38 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A9DD5C
 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:09:38 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD34314
 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:09:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from eagle.yuri.org (stunnel@localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (authenticated bits=0)
 by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0FK9bHd009824
 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:09:37 -0800 (PST)
 (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
Message-ID: <50F5B781.4070501@rawbw.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:09:37 -0800
From: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Is there a way to prioritize disk operations ?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:09:38 -0000

Currently one can set nice value to the process. But it only affects the 
CPU scheduling, so if this process is CPU bound it would yield to others.
What if the process is disk-bound, like some backup operations? The 
backup copying large disk seriously affects performance of all other 
apps accessing the same disk.

Is there a way to set the priority value on the process for the disk 
operations, so that all disk operations originating from the process 
will be scheduled in similar way how CPU is scheduled based on the nice 
value of the process? The disk-intense backup process with low disk 
priority won't affect the other processes at all.

Yuri