From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 15:08:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068621065676 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:08:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c_longfoot@hotmail.com) Received: from snt0-omc4-s40.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc4-s40.snt0.hotmail.com [65.54.51.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04B58FC16 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:08:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SNT121-W12 ([65.55.90.199]) by snt0-omc4-s40.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:07:46 -0700 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [95.112.133.24] From: Carolyn Longfoot To: Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:07:45 +0000 Importance: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Apr 2012 15:07:46.0030 (UTC) FILETIME=[015BA0E0:01CD222C] Subject: Ports Libraries - Shared object "libz.so.5" not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:08:52 -0000 I'm on 9.0 Release AMD64 and did not have Compat8x installed from ports whi= ch fixed the issue=2C but I am wondering what (apart from upgrading *all* p= orts) would be the correct approach to find out which port needs to be upda= ted so that whatever references the libz.so.5 version instead of libz.so.6 = gets updated? This is very confusing to me because I got the error with php=2C and I am o= n the very latest php5-5.3.10_1 version which I would expect to reference c= urrent libraries. Now I also have a problem with libssl.so.7=2C which popped up with Samba36.= Again I'm wondering what version provides the .7 incarnation. I found a comment (http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3D21886) that= this library is part of security/openssl but a reinstall just now of opens= sl only gave me libssl.so.8=2C so that's no longer valid. Creating a link t= o libssl.so.7 fixes the problem but is probably not the correct approach. I guess the summary of the above is the question how one should go about ke= eping/getting the right library versions. Or is that really a port problem = because they do not keep step with dependencies? An explanation in layman's terms would be appreciated :-) Thanks=2C Caro =