Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 16:06:06 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> To: kamalp@acm.org Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INTR_FAST Message-ID: <b637f4d7-d88b-852d-aefb-302533a44b08@selasky.org> In-Reply-To: <CAK=yUGL69NrsqUMzXmCrW1pfhY_BZmtjr-zgMpZig9Om7H65%2Bg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAK=yUG%2B5p1VAsmLtdEsFuw%2BvbsAJz55E_EV8X-ePMVZVR3p05g@mail.gmail.com> <7ed79c1d-2d66-5011-286f-8dcac058f7d5@selasky.org> <CAK=yUGL69NrsqUMzXmCrW1pfhY_BZmtjr-zgMpZig9Om7H65%2Bg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2020-08-27 16:01, Kamal R. Prasad wrote: > is it common practice to move clock and serial io interrupt handlers to the > filter handler? Yes, but you have to be careful and use spin mutexes for synchronization. You are not allowed to lock regular blocking mutexes in there! --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b637f4d7-d88b-852d-aefb-302533a44b08>