From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 22:20:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DBDA1065670 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 22:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joh.hendriks@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAC08FC16 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 22:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so2580738wgb.31 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:20:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9EuFRyTKsKHny4vOLRArehqSOPQ9ECyFhIb4qxdbiSQ=; b=fVYRv5xy5xFUlFWDMkZ/eLHO03cIj+bAck0Ek6QJCqhofcE3uXNPU2IE6qRM2TxD+8 YIJlJgJjctm+HQFkWhLrba0DfN1nQW1HZ3eXlzNa5hddiwneTEwzjBaaFXlM5rxFNzy+ Pm3foZPbkNyIz23FJAy6fTN9bkQ5zRVMQdHOUG3DS5yMm2CJIzUIE1i0ChkWo3yIPkYu rIAxYo3Fgv29k3R1c/ZQqqJkYRbTX9iddMA5KQW12znJ0plDRsg3ZemGpL7MIUTjyvtV zHTGODXY8HjCr6VMjnOZKeB+XoHZnTWFVnORvSqMW7ujcc1gcZtsiOK7y7L6KY1a0Oc/ fwDw== Received: by 10.216.218.216 with SMTP id k66mr4897850wep.191.1339366806022; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:20:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.13] (5ED0E470.cm-7-1d.dynamic.ziggo.nl. [94.208.228.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k8sm31670299wia.6.2012.06.10.15.20.04 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:20:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FD51D95.5030402@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:20:05 +0200 From: Johan Hendriks User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120604 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sebastian Stach References: <4FCE37FC.1090405@gmail.com> <878874BA-2F5C-4A7E-8690-2A8A96536AE0@t-online.de> <4FCE6931.6010901@quip.cz> <4FCE786A.2030205@quip.cz> <4FCF2E6E.2040902@quip.cz> <3B262A53-C137-4E4E-B1B7-7471B1FBA258@t-online.de> <4FD30EA3.8060500@quip.cz> <9F443301-7E86-44D2-8792-4198C827C25D@t-online.de> In-Reply-To: <9F443301-7E86-44D2-8792-4198C827C25D@t-online.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: em interfaces supermicro X9SCM-F board / X9SCA-F X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 22:20:13 -0000 Sebastian Stach schreef: > Am 09.06.2012 um 10:51 schrieb Miroslav Lachman: > >> Hi, >> >> I changed the switch to 1Gbps and run the test again. >> >> No problems with the NICs. The iperf is running for 10 hours now. 2TB of data was transmitted in both directions. >> >> I am running an endless loop on a client side >> >> while 1 >> iperf -c xx.xx.xx.xx --format k -m -p 999 -t 1800 -d >> sleep 5 >> end >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> Server listening on TCP port 999 >> TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default) >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> Client connecting to yy.yy.yy.yy, TCP port 999 >> TCP window size: 137 KByte (default) >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> [ 5] local xx.xx.xx.xx port 18834 connected with yy.yy.yy.yy port 999 >> [ 4] local xx.xx.xx.xx port 999 connected with yy.yy.yy.yy port 59754 >> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth >> [ 4] 0.0-1800.0 sec 82823213 KBytes 376938 Kbits/sec >> [ 4] MSS size 1448 bytes (MTU 1500 bytes, ethernet) >> [ 5] 0.0-1800.0 sec 73954944 KBytes 336575 Kbits/sec >> [ 5] MSS size 1448 bytes (MTU 1500 bytes, ethernet) >> >> >> And another endless loop on server side >> >> while 1 >> iperf -s -p 999 >> end >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> Server listening on TCP port 999 >> TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default) >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> [ 4] local yy.yy.yy.yy port 999 connected with xx.xx.xx.xx port 18834 >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> Client connecting to xx.xx.xx.xx, TCP port 999 >> TCP window size: 65.0 KByte (default) >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> [ 6] local yy.yy.yy.yy port 59754 connected with xx.xx.xx.xx port 999 >> Waiting for server threads to complete. Interrupt again to force quit. >> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth >> [ 6] 0.0-1800.0 sec 79.0 GBytes 377 Mbits/sec >> [ 4] 0.0-1800.0 sec 70.5 GBytes 337 Mbits/sec >> >> >> Client is on the Supermicro X9SCA-F >> >> em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=4219b >> ether 00:25:90:73:d1:76 >> inet xx.xx.xx.xx netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast xx.xx.xx.xx >> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) >> status: active >> >> >> Server is running on the Cisco UCS C200 M2 >> >> igb0: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=401bb >> ether 50:57:a8:af:eb:0a >> inet yy.yy.yy.yy netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast yy.yy.yy.yy >> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) >> status: active >> >> Both sides are running FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE amd64 GENERIC >> >> So the only difference is that I am using NIC em0 in shared mode for remote management. Can you try your test with shared mode? >> >> Miroslav Lachman > I did a test on my system again. My second NIC is working without problems > but the first one is still hanging after a while even when configured in shared mode. > I will contact the support again and if the issue cannot be resolved shortly i will > RMA the board. > > Thanks again for doing the test on your system. > > Sebastian Stach > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" The support team from supermicro send me a new NIC EEPROM. After installing, both nics are seen by FreeBSD. 1. This EEPROM package is for X9SCM(-F) and X9SCL(-F). 2. Changed SVID to 15D9 in EEPROM files. 3. For X9SCL-F and X9SCM-F, please use X9SCLF batch file. 4. For X9SCL and X9SCM, please use X9SCL batch file. So for me the problems are solved. regards Johan