From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 17 20:33:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB3437B401 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 20:33:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from walnut.he.net (walnut.he.net [64.71.137.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF9443F75 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 20:33:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kmacy@fsmware.com) Received: from localhost (kmacy@localhost) by walnut.he.net (8.8.6p2003-03-31/8.8.2) with ESMTP id UAA22412; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 20:33:31 -0700 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 20:33:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Kip Macy X-Sender: kmacy@walnut.he.net To: Peter Ross In-Reply-To: <20030618122633.R807@guckloch.optushome.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iSCSI and clustering with FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Clustering FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 03:33:27 -0000 > I read about bigger projects in Germany running AFS successfully. I 've > got a really enthusiastic mail from an administrator maintaining one of > these sites. AFS continues to be successfully deployed by many universities, CMU and Stanford come to mind. > But I read some rumours that AFS isn't running well on FreeBSD (gossip on > the German FreeBSD mailing list). Is it true? I've never worked with AFS. The closest I've come to it is knowing one of the main developers. > BTW: I wrote two weeks ago that I like to start writing an iSCSI > initiator. I spent the last days reading documents and sources and > installing my programming and test environment. > > So I didn't start writing yet but I'm on the way.. There is a fair amount to come up to speed with. A number of aspects of the protocol don't make sense until you try implementing it. -Kip