From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 17 02:32:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CA516A4CE; Tue, 17 May 2005 02:32:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C05543D9A; Tue, 17 May 2005 02:32:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@irotas.net) Received: from web3.messagingengine.com (web3.internal [10.202.2.212]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8DDC90AB5; Mon, 16 May 2005 22:32:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: by web3.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 2C0F56CFB; Mon, 16 May 2005 22:32:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1116297146.4271.234280167@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: 2UZ8VPKSdmI/avGpFyu4r88SdhUIycWH5flRfvXOmnib 1116297146 From: "Adam McLaurin" To: shipley@dis.org, krion@FreeBSD.org Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 1.5 (F2.73; T1.001; A1.64; B3.05; Q3.03) Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 22:32:26 -0400 cc: FreeBSD-Ports Subject: net/libnet vs net/libnet-devel X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 02:32:34 -0000 Is there a particlar reason why we're hanging on to net/libnet v1.0.2a? v1.1.x was started in early 2003, which is when net/libnet-devel was introduced. However, according to http://www.packetfactory.net/projects/libnet/ , v1.1.2.1 is the latest "stable", and v1.1.3 is the latest "beta". Would it make sense to get rid of v1.0.2a, move v1.1.2.1 into net/libnet, and upgrade net/libnet-devel to v1.1.3 ? Thanks, Adam McLaurin