Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 06 Dec 2020 14:05:35 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 251126] Resurrect databases/py-rrdtool_lgpl
Message-ID:  <bug-251126-7788-TJEKMvEPPC@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-251126-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-251126-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251126

--- Comment #7 from Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@FreeBSD.org> ---
Created attachment 220310
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D220310&action=
=3Dedit
patch with new, not resurrected port

Hi Daniel,

Inspired by comment #6 I created a port that should work as expected.

Some decisions had to be made:

- The port should not be a further development of the former port
databases/py-rrdtool-lgpl, because the naming does not fit well and the for=
mer
port was based on other sources

- Um zuk=C3=BCnftige Updates zu erleichtern, soll der Sourcecode von Pypi b=
ezogen
werden

- While the original source on Github is called python-rrdtool [1], the pro=
ject
page on Pypi [2] and the tarball there are only named rrdtool. The port sho=
uld
be fully named as on Github, plus the prefix depending on the Python versio=
n.
So that CHEESESHOP can find the source, a part of PORTNAME had to be moved =
to
PKGNAMEPREFIX

- I have extended the text in pkg-descr with information from the github pa=
ge.
Also the URL now points to the original source


[1] https://github.com/commx/python-rrdtool
[2] https://pypi.org/project/rrdtool/


IMPORTANT:=20
I think it would be useful if the port would additionally inform that the
Python bindings can also be installed by enabling the OpTION PYTHON in the =
main
port databases/rrdtool. But this should not be done if the Python bindings =
are
to be installed via databases/py-python-rrdtools.


What do you think about all this? If you agree in principle, it would be ni=
ce
to test this proposal for the port. If the port builds, installs, and if it
works as expected with rrdtool ...

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-251126-7788-TJEKMvEPPC>