From owner-freebsd-current Mon Dec 27 19: 3: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from implode.root.com (root.com [209.102.106.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBC214DD8 for ; Mon, 27 Dec 1999 19:03:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dg@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA12518; Mon, 27 Dec 1999 18:58:41 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199912280258.SAA12518@implode.root.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Matthew Dillon , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposed patch to fix VN device (again) In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 28 Dec 1999 03:11:38 +0100." <13069.946347098@critter.freebsd.dk> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Mon, 27 Dec 1999 18:58:41 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've heard from both of you that you think the other is wrong. This isn't very helpful, however, in finding the correct solution. What I'd like to hear from both of you is the reasons why swap is better as a device, or not. There seems to be some unstated architectural philosophy that needs to be stated before any informed decision can be made about what is the right direction to go in. -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org Creator of high-performance Internet servers - http://www.terasolutions.com Pave the road of life with opportunities. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message