From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 23 17:41:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19346BD; Thu, 23 May 2013 17:41:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roger.pau@citrix.com) Received: from SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM (smtp.eu.citrix.com [46.33.159.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0EF2A3; Thu, 23 May 2013 17:41:53 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,729,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="4914017" Received: from lonpex01cl01.citrite.net ([10.30.203.101]) by LONPIPO01.EU.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 23 May 2013 17:41:52 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.30] (10.30.203.1) by LONPEX01CL01.citrite.net (10.30.203.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.3; Thu, 23 May 2013 18:41:51 +0100 Message-ID: <519E54DE.5090304@citrix.com> Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 19:41:50 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: FreeBSD PVHVM call for testing References: <519131D8.9010307@citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <519131D8.9010307@citrix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.30.203.1] Cc: "xen-users@lists.xen.org" , "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" , xen-devel X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 17:41:55 -0000 Hello, I've pushed a new branch, pvhvm_v10 that contains a PV IPI implementation for both amd64 and i386. I've also updated the wiki to point to the pvhvm_v10 branch: http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=people/royger/freebsd.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/pvhvm_v10 I've updated my tree to latest HEAD, so now branch pvhvm_v10 is on top of this commit: commit b44da0fb82647f2cfb06f65a6695c7e36c98828c Author: gber Date: Thu May 23 12:24:46 2013 +0000 Rework and organize pmap_enter_locked() function. pmap_enter_locked() implementation was very ambiguous and confusing. Rearrange it so that each part of the mapping creation is separated. Avoid walking through the redundant conditions. Extract vector_page specific PTE setup from normal PTE setting. Submitted by: Zbigniew Bodek Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation, Semihalf Thanks for the testing, Roger.