From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 12 12:34:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC6537B404 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 12:34:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1AA443F93 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 12:34:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.no-ip.com[66.30.200.37]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2003071219340201500gj7n2e>; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 19:34:02 +0000 Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [66.30.200.37] (may be forged)) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6CJXulA070619; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 15:33:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: (from lowell@localhost) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id h6CJXtXX070616; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 15:33:55 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: be-well.ilk.org: lowell set sender to freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org using -f Sender: lowell@be-well.no-ip.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20030710032006.V1031@metafocus.net> From: Lowell Gilbert In-Reply-To: <20030710032006.V1031@metafocus.net> Message-ID: <44u19rk09o.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: Dave Subject: Re: Lock Order Reversal (5.1 CUR kern) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 19:34:03 -0000 X-Original-Date: 12 Jul 2003 15:33:55 -0400 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 19:34:03 -0000 Dave writes: > My thinking: the threading in the kernel for 5.1 CURRENT hasn't all the > kinks out yet. Does anyone know what is going on? > > Before rushing off to the FreeBSD people with it though, they 1) might > already be aware, and 2) maybe I don't understand the error entirely and > its a problem with how I setup my system? > > So I'm asking here I guess. If you're going to track -CURRENT, you really should read the -CURRENT mailing list. Offhand, I can't see how the system map would be getting locked in your case, but you're right that it seems to be a bug in the threading code (DRM *is* likely to be related, since it constitutes a separate path into "direct" memory manipulation...).