From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Nov 16 22:50:13 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C761DEBFF9; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 22:50:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agapon@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-f54.google.com (mail-lf0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF5726EF98; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 22:50:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agapon@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-f54.google.com with SMTP id i14so677134lfc.1; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 14:50:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VvCxy5pPrv3mkrVY/HdVa/4H6k/pf5NicmBJHO7mB+8=; b=kz9ReBUjY1tVxnyZnvijBPm4rJT2RpGT/ogip9rhUvR3WM5u0rvR5LPwfT54hN1k9e hb+PFYUYHUREiNxE2ipHn4YwoHdrc00QoMbPXF+JAbml3riRX7Cp1qokpyg1rYQh1YbC 0V5asJcpbPSw+7cXIc+OfibwruLAe59A9C+VIO6uU9ucoiWLNs8bEmeLzlMbgM62gS+F JTsUVyMnO8wOemT7AIHXupw5HPI5GG90KUZuwQ5XmWjik2MxKZacnfRREa5HgImt4wvV 0+qJej5pPgPduJ4/GxyLkF2cTGO6JcuBZzoKIce7azsnEs4eu63awHtIAFcxxmTSBfaD GUJg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4mxns2L6tT6yJDto6KQU4df+B6z1DNwi0Ojz1q2lBkWONSnnZ4 ZjwKf9rcC+EGW95dxMgAMpuy2BDoaU8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMa9nnan30XnIx//KjtHTw3ZKegNQqyWhG+foQcfVG1T4boqZKEf/sEIH6GJjygDNcAXWOX4pg== X-Received: by 10.46.16.76 with SMTP id j73mr1581780lje.170.1510872604723; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 14:50:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.88] (east.meadow.volia.net. [93.72.151.96]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id r125sm404050lfr.46.2017.11.16.14.50.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Nov 2017 14:50:03 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] posix_fallocate support removed from ZFS, lld affected To: Ed Maste Cc: Ian Lepore , FreeBSD Current , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org References: <7e5599e4-2faa-29b6-4fb2-a0744a12681a@FreeBSD.org> <1509989176.99235.79.camel@freebsd.org> <153bfe2b-e65e-2036-3391-984c6ba00ffe@FreeBSD.org> From: Andriy Gapon Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:50:01 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 22:50:13 -0000 On 13/11/2017 17:02, Ed Maste wrote: > On 7 November 2017 at 13:12, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> I hope that lld is not that widely used now. >> But I admit that I put the cart before the horse. >> I didn't expect that posix_fallocate is used in the development toolchain and I >> didn't try to check for it. > > For amd64 it is probably not a very large problem; it's not used by > default and those who have enabled it can likely adapt. However, it is > used by arm64 and is the default linker in FreeBSD 11.1, so we'll need > to go with either an errata fix or Kostik's p_osrel suggestion to > avoid breaking the package builds. I agree with that proposal. I think that that is what I should have done from the very start. I need a little bit of help to implement it, though. -- Andriy Gapon