From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov 29 23:03:01 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D066A106564A;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2011 23:03:01 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from yongari@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E42E8FC12;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2011 23:03:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pATN31wb062455;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2011 23:03:01 GMT
	(envelope-from yongari@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from yongari@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id pATN30W7062450;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2011 23:03:00 GMT (envelope-from yongari)
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 23:03:00 GMT
Message-Id: <201111292303.pATN30W7062450@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org, yongari@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org, 
	yongari@FreeBSD.org
From: yongari@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/162932: [ed][panic][patch] large traffic yields occasional
	panics
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 23:03:01 -0000

Synopsis: [ed][panic][patch] large traffic yields occasional panics

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: yongari
State-Changed-When: Tue Nov 29 23:01:36 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why: 
It seems that the code path referenced invalid address when a mbuf
length is odd bytes.  I created a new diff based on your patch
since your patch may still invoke bus_space_write_1(9) if mbuf
length is even bytes.  I also added mbuf length check and used NULL
in comparing a mbuf pointer.

You can find the patch at the following URL.
http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/ed.pf.diff

Let me know whether this patch works for you.


Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->yongari
Responsible-Changed-By: yongari
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Nov 29 23:01:36 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
Grab.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=162932