From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Feb 11 20:21:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from m3.cs.berkeley.edu (m3.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.45.179]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C13DE3DDC; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 20:21:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca6-93.ix.netcom.com [205.186.213.93]) by m3.cs.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA59719; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 20:11:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id UAA99174; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 20:10:41 -0800 (PST) To: Bill Fumerola Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, shige@FreeBSD.org, torstenb@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: zsh re-org. References: <20000211224848.A92177@jade.chc-chimes.com> From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 11 Feb 2000 20:10:12 -0800 In-Reply-To: Bill Fumerola's message of "Fri, 11 Feb 2000 22:48:48 -0500" Message-ID: Lines: 18 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.5 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: Bill Fumerola * I believe that the way that zsh is being handled should be flipped around. * * ports/shells/zsh should be 3.1.6 * ports/shells/zsh-devel should be retired (after making shells/zsh 3.1.6) * * I don't believe we need a 3.0.7 version of zsh in the tree at all. * * Comments? Fine by me. (But then, I don't use zsh. :) By the way, if you just splat 3.1.6 over the current zsh, zsh/Makefile revisions 1.28 - 1.35 will be lost, but I don't think it's too much of a problem. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message