From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Aug 27 13: 5:34 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from math.smsu.edu (math.smsu.edu [146.7.45.198])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F42837B407
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 13:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from erik@math.smsu.edu)
Received: by math.smsu.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 666928E451; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:05:30 -0500 (CDT)
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: sysconf() vs sysctl()
Message-Id: <20010827200530.666928E451@math.smsu.edu>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:05:30 -0500 (CDT)
From: erik@math.smsu.edu (Erik Greenwald)
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-hackers.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi

Are there any plans to implement'_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF' in sysconf() ? I'm
aware of hw.ncpu and the sysctl() call with {CTL_HW,HW_NCPU}, but sysconf is
posix and sysctl is not :) (is it already done in 5.0? I'm using 4.4)

thnx

        -Erik <erik@smluc.org> [http://math.smsu.edu/~erik]

The opinions expressed by me are not necessarily opinions. In all probability,
they are random rambling, and to be ignored. Failure to ignore may result in
severe boredom or confusion. Shake well before opening. Keep Refrigerated.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message