Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 25 Nov 2001 19:39:57 -0800
From:      Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org>
To:        Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/tail forward.c
Message-ID:  <20011125193957.O20895@ninja1.internal>
In-Reply-To: <200111260038.aa52845@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>; from "iedowse@maths.tcd.ie" on Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at = 12:38:47AM
References:  <20011125153656.A94203@xor.obsecurity.org> <200111260038.aa52845@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >I dunno..the major use of tail -F is probably on logfiles which get
> >rotated infrequently.  I can imagine that a site might want to
> >simultaneously monitor a large number of logfiles, but I don't know
> >what the CPU impact of that with your change would be..maybe not much.
> >If you tail -F, say, 100 simultaneous files, how much CPU does that
> >stat'ing use?
> 
> Running 100 "tail -F"s requires a pretty negliglible amount of CPU
> time (try it!), but kqueue does help by allowing the processes to
> be swapped out during any long pauses between file updates.
> 
> The reason for this change is simply to fix a particular use of
> tail that was broken by the addition of kqueue support. The current
> code gives us about half of the kqueue gains over the pre-kqueue
> version for the -F case (changes noticed quickly, polling frequency
> reduced by a factor of 4). Doing better is of course possible, but
> it doesn't seem particularly easy. Maybe the author of this patch
> (Maxim Konovalov) would be willing to have a go at it.

Why not wrap this functionality in a new CLI argument?  If I'm tailing
over NFS or some non-kq enabled FS, then I'll turn on the flag
manually (ex: -N).  Seems like this is a step backwards to me...  -sc

-- 
Sean Chittenden

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011125193957.O20895>