From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 29 16:25:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC6F16A4DA for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:25:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bv@bilver.wjv.com) Received: from wjv.com (fl-65-40-24-38.sta.embarqhsd.net [65.40.24.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45FA843D5A for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:25:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bv@bilver.wjv.com) Received: from bilver.wjv.com (localhost.wjv.com [127.0.0.1]) by wjv.com (8.13.7/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k7TGOwKK025739 for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:24:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bv@bilver.wjv.com) Received: (from bv@localhost) by bilver.wjv.com (8.13.7/8.13.1/Submit) id k7TGOr59025732 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:24:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bv) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:24:53 -0400 From: Bill Vermillion To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060829162452.GA88586@wjv.com> References: <20060829120052.0B1E416A5A0@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060829120052.0B1E416A5A0@hub.freebsd.org> Organization: W.J.Vermillion / Orlando - Winter Park ReplyTo: bv@wjv.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on bilver.wjv.com Subject: Re: A handy utility (at least for me) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bv@wjv.com List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:25:02 -0000 On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 12:00 freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org saw "Error reading FAT table? Try SKINNY table?" And promptly said: > Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:18:58 +0200 (CEST) > From: Oliver Fromme > Subject: Re: A handy utility (at least for me) > Rick C. Petty wrote: > > Mario Lobo wrote: > > > My /usr/ports directory was occuping 24 gigs, of which 20 > > > was just from the 'work' directories ! > You should type "make clean" more often. ;-) And to ensure that 'make clean' in the /usr/ports directory runs much faster, be sure to add NOCLEANDEPENDS=YES in your /etc/make.conf. After you run that on the entire tree besure to comment it out so that when you run make clean inside a port you clean all the dependancies too. Bill -- Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com