From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Apr 9 11:15:37 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (adsl-64-173-15-98.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [64.173.15.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DAAC37B422 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 11:15:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f39IFR811298; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 11:15:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) To: dan@langille.org Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Releases In-Reply-To: References: <20010409105223C.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010409111527V.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 11:15:27 -0700 From: Jordan Hubbard X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 14 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > OK. But if you didn't want to be involved in the first place, you > should have stayed out of it. [Best "cool hand Luke" voice] "Son, what we have here is a failure to communicate!" The fact that I think this is a waste of time and you're on a fool's errand is certainly something I'm free to communicate. The fact that I feel that way is also good reason for me to suggest that you do the work if you're hell-bent on proving me wrong - that's a time-honored and more than acceptable way of delivering your rebuttal. I have been as "involved" in this discussion as I needed to be, thanks. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message