From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 10 11:55:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0075B16A420; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 11:55:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (comp.chem.msu.su [158.250.32.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958A643D46; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 11:55:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9ABtMFN065646; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:55:23 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: (from yar@localhost) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j9ABtI8t065637; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:55:18 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from yar) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:55:18 +0400 From: Yar Tikhiy To: "M. Warner Losh" Message-ID: <20051010115518.GC63395@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <20051009082017.GB81198@comp.chem.msu.su> <20051009171512.GA2523@flame.pc> <20051009173106.GB9137@comp.chem.msu.su> <20051009.210132.13313527.imp@bsdimp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051009.210132.13313527.imp@bsdimp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, keramida@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SENDMAIL_MC & making world X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 11:55:44 -0000 On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 09:01:32PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20051009173106.GB9137@comp.chem.msu.su> > Yar Tikhiy writes: > : On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 08:15:12PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > : > > : > I've always found __MAKE_CONF very useful, but it's not documented in > : > the ``obvious'' places (i.e. the manpage). I think I should add at > : > least a note about it in the manpage of make > : > : FWIW, we have make.conf(5) manpage already, and __MAKE_CONF seems > : to belong to it better than to make(1). make(1) xrefs make.conf(5) > : already. I think I can do the job if you are busy with something > : else currently. > > __MAKE_CONF should be documented in make(1) since it is in > /usr/share/mk/sys.mk and global to the entire system for all make jobs > (not just those controlled by buildworld). It should also be in > make.conf(5). Agreed. sys.mk is somewhere between make(1) and make.conf(5), so __MAKE_CONF belongs to both until we decide some day we need manpages for our *.mk files. And make.conf(5) contains an incorrect statement that /etc/make.conf applies to system builds only. I'll fix this. -- Yar