From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 15:31:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC5A106566B; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 15:31:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mouf.net (unknown [IPv6:2607:fc50:0:4400:216:3eff:fe69:33b2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1F28FC0A; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 15:31:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from meatwad.mouf.net (cpe-024-162-230-236.nc.res.rr.com [24.162.230.236]) (authenticated bits=0) by mouf.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q08FVJqC082308 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 8 Jan 2012 10:31:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4F09B6C6.4030209@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 10:31:18 -0500 From: Steve Wills User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111228 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ohauer@FreeBSD.org References: <201201080120.q081Kdq3018820@repoman.freebsd.org> <4F08FDB1.7000607@FreeBSD.org> <4F0983DE.9030609@freebsd.org> <4F098926.7000903@freebsd.org> <4F098D72.1030004@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F098D72.1030004@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (mouf.net [204.109.58.86]); Sun, 08 Jan 2012 10:31:19 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at mouf.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Michael Scheidell , Gabor Kovesdan , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/open-vm-tools Makefile distinfo pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 15:31:20 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/08/12 07:34, Olli Hauer wrote: > On 2012-01-08 13:16, Michael Scheidell wrote: >> so, vote? >> >> revert with portepoch? or mark broken for now? > > If only vmhgfs is an issue, then don't mark it broken and don't go > back. True, vmhgfs isn't critical for some users (including myself), but may be critical for others. I'm OK with waiting for a fix if it won't take long. > There is a good change it will work on ESX where no hgfs exist Yes, I haven't tested that yet, but can do that hopefully today (I have the free ESXi 5 setup at home). Steve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPCbbGAAoJEPXPYrMgexuh9fQIAK0flOYHt+gNJRcw+1xDRO91 l4IFFFJmQOXYcD05Ak0esp8e/rAVS7ci6fSBhJW9QQ2JZPNi4glmBh4ZVcWTGO2C X6nvb9zCkGsgK9hGFLZ/PmlaqQ0/eR+1ph3UMomf3TZEf1CWHcUFEh0qMD+yc1MI krH+vITBc+jQ/zlXPvYMjpDOBl9W6CkXi5YyFS1WnsX/SF5I6agurr5VRaNmjT2f SnXDrefbVNC1JzmevFns8ggRNAwhC+4xEdVsQ1Pzw5LIdTAIc9YQLwtQGwOvWwC8 6vujXdkZV1lB0hK6wDFAJIOuUYpO8jngt3Mq9CpJ5P6RRIXx0RkhM0Ck0Z7XqdQ= =QPLb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----