Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 20:35:03 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@Glue.umd.edu> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, julian@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Netatalk port broken? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980223203200.5759A-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980223191441.14406r-100000@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Chuck Robey wrote: > On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > I can't seem to compile it under -current. Just FYI. > > > > Uhh, curious ... how come you can't use the netatalk that's part of > current itself? Doesn't it work? I haven't tried it myself ... but I > will soon (to get this old mac over here talking to me). > > options NETATALK #Appletalk communications protocols That just implements the basic protcols. You need userland stuff to make it useful. Things like the appletalk routing daemon (atalkd), file services (afpd), and print services (papd). Those are in the port. -john To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980223203200.5759A-100000>