From owner-freebsd-hardware  Fri Aug 18 12:37:34 1995
Return-Path: hardware-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id MAA14473
          for hardware-outgoing; Fri, 18 Aug 1995 12:37:34 -0700
Received: from sivka.carrier.kiev.ua (sivka.carrier.kiev.ua [193.125.68.130])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA14443
          for <hardware@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Aug 1995 12:37:22 -0700
Received: from elvisti.kiev.ua (uuelvis@localhost) by sivka.carrier.kiev.ua (Sendmail 8.who.cares/5)
           with UUCP id WAA26810 for hardware@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Aug 1995 22:36:10 +0300
Received: from office.elvisti.kiev.ua (office.elvisti.kiev.ua [193.125.28.33]) by spider2.elvisti.kiev.ua (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAA27174 for <hardware@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Aug 1995 22:25:19 +0300
Received: (from stesin@localhost) by office.elvisti.kiev.ua (8.6.12/8.6.9) id WAA10827 for hardware@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Aug 1995 22:25:17 +0300
From: "Andrew V. Stesin" <stesin@elvisti.kiev.ua>
Message-Id: <199508181925.WAA10827@office.elvisti.kiev.ua>
Subject: How to recognize bad Conner 1060S ?
To: hardware@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 1995 22:25:17 +0300 (EET DST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24alpha5]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 357       
Sender: hardware-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

Hello world, :-)

being short:

   How one can tell does Conner 1060 have a bad firmware (as was
   discussed recently) or an already patched one?
   Today I got 2 such drives in a new box at work and now I'm
   very nervous about this. Installation of 2.0.5 from CD is
   now running...

-- 

	With best wishes -- Andrew Stesin, Elvisti.Kiev.UA sysadmin.