From owner-freebsd-ports Tue May 26 21:14:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA13362 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Tue, 26 May 1998 21:14:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA13202; Tue, 26 May 1998 21:13:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mph@FreeBSD.org) From: Matthew Hunt Received: (from mph@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) id VAA14164; Tue, 26 May 1998 21:07:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 21:07:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199805270407.VAA14164@freefall.freebsd.org> To: dcarmich@mcs.com, mph@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, mph@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/6767 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: Here's the fetchmail-4.4.8 port update with the checksum fixed. State-Changed-From-To: open-closed State-Changed-By: mph State-Changed-When: Wed May 27 00:05:10 EDT 1998 State-Changed-Why: Update applied. There are several changes, because the port with your patches did not build and install here; one of the patches in the port did not apply cleanly, install failed for two different reasons (stripping a script, and bug in Makefile.in had a backwards ln). Note that if you make an error in a PR, you should followup on the same PR with corrections, instead of opening a new PR. Also, version updates are not critical or high priority in most circumstances. Thank you for your submission. Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->mph Responsible-Changed-By: mph Responsible-Changed-When: Wed May 27 00:05:10 EDT 1998 Responsible-Changed-Why: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message