From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 13 09:41:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F889106564A; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:41:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juli@clockworksquid.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f193.google.com (mail-pz0-f193.google.com [209.85.222.193]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 427AC8FC1A; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:41:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juli@clockworksquid.com) Received: by pzk31 with SMTP id 31so1654551pzk.3 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:41:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.171.3 with SMTP id t3mr1212405wfe.212.1247476221110; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:10:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5BE6CEC9-8F49-473B-A3E4-2702680A8836@mac.com> References: <20090605051203.GD1705@garage.freebsd.pl> <46FB00ED-62DC-4924-A84A-8C34B26DA22E@mac.com> <20090605200512.GA2313@garage.freebsd.pl> <5BE6CEC9-8F49-473B-A3E4-2702680A8836@mac.com> From: Juli Mallett Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:10:01 -0700 Message-ID: To: Marcel Moolenaar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: marcel@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek , Randi Harper , freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is anything being done to un-break partition names? X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:41:27 -0000 On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 13:38, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > That introduces significant breakages in normal setups. > The priority should not be changed. It's resulting in > the right behaviour and any exceptions to that (i.e. > we need the wrong behaviour) should be coded explicitly. > > The closest we can get is by having the BSD disklabel > code check if there are valid MBR partitions defined > and if yes, back-off. This covers exactly the problem > case and doesn't introduce false negatives in other > scenarios. Are there any efforts outstanding to do this for 8.0? Or did it get done and I missed it? > But: we should fix sysinstall as well. Either we should > finally rip out DD or we should have it create proper > DD images... Perhaps randi@ will take a look; she's been working on nearby parts of sysinstall for a while. Adding her to CC since I don't know if she reads geom@.