From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 29 16:37:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9DC16A4CE for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:37:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from heceta.db.net (heceta.db.net [66.11.169.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149AE43D6B for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:37:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from db@db.net) Received: from heceta.db.net ([66.11.169.52] helo=localhost ident=mailnull) by heceta.db.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 4.8) id 1CNZky-000DYB-SV; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:37:40 -0400 Received: from localhost.dbn ([127.0.0.1] helo=night.dbn) by night.db.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1CNZlJ-000GAr-Hb; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:38:01 -0400 Received: (from db@localhost) by night.dbn (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i9TGbqoC062176; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:37:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from db@night.dbn) Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:37:52 -0400 From: Diane Bruce To: David Schwartz Message-ID: <20041029163752.GA62159@night.dbn> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: TM4525@aol.com cc: chat@freebsd.org cc: tedm@toybox.placo.com Subject: Re: GPL vs BSD Licence X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:37:58 -0000 On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 09:24:55AM -0700, David Schwartz wrote: > > > The GPL and Linux don't care if you link into their system libraries, > > they expect that which is why the system libraries are LGPLd ... > If I write a piece of code that uses a defined interface, it's utterly > preposterous to argue that it is derivative from an *implementation* of that > interface, since it could be used with *any* implementation of that > interface. I suppose, one *could* have the situation where someone does a "clean room" set of new include files derived from GPL ones. (This has happened already btw) and have the DCMA used against this derivation. (I suppose. I am not a lawyer.) - Diane