From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jul 3 22:38:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mercury.mich.com (mercury.mich.com [64.79.64.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24EC737C0DF; Mon, 3 Jul 2000 22:38:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@almanac.yi.org) Received: from argon.gryphonsoft.com (pm002-002.dialup.bignet.net [64.79.80.50]) by mercury.mich.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA09647; Tue, 4 Jul 2000 01:37:43 -0400 Received: by argon.gryphonsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 03F8C1992; Tue, 4 Jul 2000 01:35:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 01:35:45 -0400 From: Will Andrews To: Andy Farkas Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/19635: add -c for grand total to df(1), like du(1) does Message-ID: <20000704013545.F94372@argon.gryphonsoft.com> References: <20000703212151.B94372@argon.gryphonsoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from andyf@speednet.com.au on Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 03:32:11PM +1000 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 03:32:11PM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote: > My only suggestion is to put a dashed line above the totals in order to > clearly say they are totals (like I did below). That might be nice, but I object on the grounds that it isn't consistent with du -c. -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message