From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Apr 15 13:51:17 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF253106566C
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:51:17 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from zmiterby@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com
	[74.125.82.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5968FC08
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:51:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wern13 with SMTP id n13so3752954wer.13
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 06:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=D5+Ru5RVM0auSxH8pJKzlkH2vXKdyyMVHNWFQLqXQvI=;
	b=uuGRS7BQq1RFxTwOtb6Mulpnjf7wP7C7nAmT7i0u4+JIF2DkGFFSxDtk8RC2yu3VoG
	QHk3gHyO2X4VOIX9wh1ZUcaECiPS/J6YDEhyp5puNuRemJpiDMrY/Q+WWJt20/AVbqqO
	Xw9uQgwVJVKpQKQwc38lgYZ7JSlfmnJx2HMWKoTGQDkOV5dqgMscuH4p1QLFDy3H82hW
	JiIDSqNsxjvRuxNjmvLBetuPVDZ22eFjuHP0EP27e5yoZs4p+fujAre4Ec7BbHP1q6Lt
	Nb820s6HhAn/te5LPGCmt6aewmG4kLcbFOOzBXqbRAfPYS1SBicTS8qh+Tz9NYdIt8We
	PsAQ==
Received: by 10.180.94.33 with SMTP id cz1mr10925028wib.13.1334497876624;
	Sun, 15 Apr 2012 06:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([178.121.136.168])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 17sm12497235wis.0.2012.04.15.06.51.14
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 15 Apr 2012 06:51:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4F8AD23C.7050803@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:50:52 +0300
From: Zmiter <zmiterby@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
	rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Patrick M. Hausen" <hausen@punkt.de>
References: <4F87AB6F.4050504@gmail.com>
	<22CC7FDB-162E-44CD-8EEA-0B5B8B560F8B@lists.zabbadoz.net>
	<DCDED7FE-142E-422E-9A48-D2987D4D9097@punkt.de>
In-Reply-To: <DCDED7FE-142E-422E-9A48-D2987D4D9097@punkt.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Support for IPSec NAT-T in transoprt mode
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:51:18 -0000

15.04.2012 16:47, Patrick M. Hausen написал:
> Racoon for IKE, standard IPSEC as shipped with RELENG_6. Was is 
> removed afterwards?
The problem in traversing NAT. IPSec+L2TP works great WITHOUT NAT.
NAT-T feature was implemented in 8.0 (There was some patches fo 7.0 as I 
remember). But it lacks of IPSec transport mode.

15.04.2012
Zmiter