From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 22 14:04:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4487A16A4B3 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:04:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-234.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559A643FD7 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:04:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DFF66DE2; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:04:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 99525DB5; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:04:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:04:12 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." Message-ID: <20031022210412.GD72140@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20031022154447.33556.qmail@web40710.mail.yahoo.com> <3F96A869.2060003@daleco.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PHCdUe6m4AxPMzOu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F96A869.2060003@daleco.biz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: rogue_spider@yahoo.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cleaning X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:04:16 -0000 --PHCdUe6m4AxPMzOu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 10:55:21AM -0500, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wro= te: > Rogue Spider wrote: >=20 > >is there a freebsd equivalent to scandisk and > >diskdefrag so that i can clean the drive it says on > >start up that the dir are fragmented but after that i > >am unsertain. > >=20 > > >=20 > If there is "fragmentation", it is cleaned up > in the boot process (for 4.x) or done in > the background after booting (on 5.x). fsck does not "defragment" the filesystem, but doing so is not necessary except under extreme usage patterns, because UFS is not so badly-designed as to require regular defragmentation. Kris --PHCdUe6m4AxPMzOu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/lvDMWry0BWjoQKURAkT9AJsGXAj6LST9dA+GSSD9xAQpCW3KlACgklce 2t4AltCk90xpysQsP1+rz5M= =EY9k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PHCdUe6m4AxPMzOu--