From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Feb 13 19:00:20 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8919A106566C
	for <freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:00:20 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 602E18FC15
	for <freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:00:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o1DJ0Kde080614
	for <freebsd-rc@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:00:20 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o1DJ0Khw080613;
	Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:00:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:00:20 GMT
Message-Id: <201002131900.o1DJ0Khw080613@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org
From: Garrett Cooper <gcooper@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: conf/143851: [patch] Some rc.d scripts confuse NO with NONE
X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Garrett Cooper <gcooper@FreeBSD.org>
List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation."
	<freebsd-rc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-rc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-rc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:00:20 -0000

The following reply was made to PR conf/143851; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Garrett Cooper <gcooper@FreeBSD.org>
To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, mah@jump-ing.de
Cc:  
Subject: Re: conf/143851: [patch] Some rc.d scripts confuse NO with NONE
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:55:53 -0800

     As noted by brucec, the rc.sendmail(8) manpage already mentions NO
 vs NONE's use:
 
      sendmail_enable
              (str) If set to ``YES'', run the sendmail(8) daemon at system
              boot time.  If set to ``NO'', do not run a sendmail(8) daemon to
              listen for incoming network mail.  This does not preclude a
              sendmail(8) daemon listening on the SMTP port of the loopback
              interface.  The ``NONE'' option is deprecated and should not be
              used.  It will be removed in a future release.
 
 # ...
 
            # MTA
            if (${sendmail_enable} == NONE)
                    # Do nothing
            else if (${sendmail_enable} == YES)
                    start sendmail with ${sendmail_flags}
            else if (${sendmail_submit_enable} == YES)
                    start sendmail with ${sendmail_submit_flags}
            else if (${sendmail_outbound_enable} == YES)
                    start sendmail with ${sendmail_outbound_flags}
            endif
 
            # MSP Queue Runner
            if (${sendmail_enable} != NONE &&
                [ -r /etc/mail/submit.cf] &&
                ${sendmail_msp_queue_enable} == YES)
                    start sendmail with ${sendmail_msp_queue_flags}
            endif
 
     So the option can be removed eventually, but not today...
 Thanks,
 -Garrett