Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 17:00:44 -0400 From: Christopher Sean Hilton <chris@vindaloo.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bind9 + TCP_FASTOPEN => no rndc Message-ID: <20170927210044.a5mnjpv2izn5wln2@csh-desktop-vm00.loopone.com> In-Reply-To: <20170927201720.GL1165@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <20170927173525.bspia3tpcu35yng3@kessel.vindaloo.com> <20170927175131.GE1165@albert.catwhisker.org> <20170927200033.pqwweoncqm4k627d@csh-desktop-vm00.loopone.com> <20170927201720.GL1165@albert.catwhisker.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 08:17:20PM +0000, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 04:00:49PM -0400, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:
...
> OK; I wasn't aware of bind911; looks as if that might be a shinier
> version of BIND 9:
>
> g1-252(11.1-S)[1] cd /usr/ports
> g1-252(11.1-S)[2] ls -Fd */bind*
> distfiles/bind-9.9.6.tar.gz dns/bind911/
> distfiles/bind-9.9.7.tar.gz dns/bind99/
> dns/bind-tools/ dns/bindgraph/
> dns/bind9-devel/ net/bindtest/
> dns/bind910/
> g1-252(11.1-S)[3] svn info --show-item last-changed-revision
> 450729
> g1-252(11.1-S)[4]
>
> So I'm running 9.9:
>
Yeah, that's a good option right now.
>
> You may want to take a look at Hiren's response to your query...
> and/or consider running dns/bind99 (which appears to be an "Extended
> Support Version").
I did look at his answer. I'm still at work so right now I'm basically
looking at my options. I actually don't need anything that's provided
by bind-9.11 so 9.10 or 9.9 is probably the right way to go.
-- Chris
--
Chris
__o "All I was trying to do was get home from work."
_`\<,_ -Rosa Parks
___(*)/_(*)____.___o____..___..o...________ooO..._____________________
Christopher Sean Hilton [chris/at/vindaloo/dot/com]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170927210044.a5mnjpv2izn5wln2>