From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 10:20:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F85A106564A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CC38FC17 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0EAK2ww022278 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:20:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n0EAK29E022277; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:20:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:20:02 GMT Message-Id: <200901141020.n0EAK29E022277@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Larry Gingras Cc: Subject: Re: ports/130538: linux_base-f8 unusable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Larry Gingras List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:20:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/130538; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Larry Gingras To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, larry@cybent.net Cc: Subject: Re: ports/130538: linux_base-f8 unusable Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:50:46 +0700 Do you mean this port (along with linux-flashplugin9 that I write about in PR 130537) requires at least FreeBSD 7.1? So then why this is not stated somewhere (in port info or at least in UPDATING)?