From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 28 05:11:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE2A1065675 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:11:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eirnym@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1822C8FC16 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:11:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwr19 with SMTP id 19so6507413iwr.13 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:11:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jvBeKZrwFYRlizNaj+WSkfRcij78CTULIMN8gFkOxH8=; b=IqHmIXiEw2EaZbwATz2Arn7fKJ6uu6VsCZcQRzZPPLPTCTI6EYv9V9cFSPI2fpUmXP t1TYdNUz9/8iM/V9RKNro2yhHirOErFmd6CL6+bNkjIfSnoJSlMMl2guMNnsk5nuiyZn KIrnPD8+1VjgnXK/x54eo1vhyIhbeapUOMz24= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Uy5XFfPfBAn3tfUhG84oiOeGoFJN0cKoXGqDHrwVe4uCUwOBpTU/1SKnCIwYaZWXmg E9xWSY7lwSpFi6xd8aUOv4aw9sCIKGaEKjHODCNj8gTeIVrnLOxO65gNKK224V3TfB0H clHIi0OdR1LToC6/XZpGabnWgUWJTHMKfK6vc= Received: by 10.231.48.197 with SMTP id s5mr2346139ibf.193.1309237866122; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:11:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.38.5 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:10:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110627174207.GA99971@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <20110623163109.GA508@dragon.NUXI.org> <20110623202153.GS48734@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20110627174207.GA99971@dragon.NUXI.org> From: Eir Nym Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:10:46 +0000 Message-ID: To: obrien@freebsd.org, Kostik Belousov , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered "highly experimental" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:11:08 -0000 On 27 June 2011 17:42, David O'Brien wrote: > Hi KIB, > Thanks for the list of issues you know about -- I don't believe we have > PRs covering those. > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:21:53PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: >> - I believe Peter Holm has more test cases that fails with tmpfs. He >> would have more details. I somewhat remember some panic on execve(2) the >> binary located on tmpfs. > > I've been following the patches you've been passing to Peter Holm as part > of this thread. =C2=A0Seems good progress has been made in fixing some of= the > issues. > > >> Removing the warning will not make the issues coming away. > > Quite true, but is there any other subsystem where we know we have bugs > and have put up such a scary warning? > > I've never used ZFS on i386, but I understand it is trivial to panic > with out-of-the-box settings. =C2=A0We don't print a dire warning for ZFS > usage on 32-bit platforms. =C2=A0So I'm not sure we should keep it for TM= PFS. > amd64 with 4G ram is also not the best for heavy-loaded ZFS server. I have to increase kernel memory up to 1.5-2 G to be sure if it works stable and fast. -- Eir Nym > > I cannot tell from your response if you're OK or against removing > the warning. =C2=A0[especially if your patches pass the Peter Holm test > and remove some of the bugs] > > -- > -- David =C2=A0(obrien@FreeBSD.org) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " >