Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 07:59:47 +0900 From: MANTANI Nobutaka <nobutaka@FreeBSD.org> To: NIIMI Satoshi <sa2c@sa2c.net> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/textproc/uim Makefile pkg-plist ports/textproc/uim-gtk Makefile pkg-plist Message-ID: <86zmi64obg.wl%nobutaka@nobutaka.org> In-Reply-To: <444FF29A.3070908@sa2c.net> References: <200604261802.k3QI2ocO031643@repoman.freebsd.org> <444FF29A.3070908@sa2c.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Thu, 27 Apr 2006 07:22:18 +0900, NIIMI Satoshi wrote: > > On 2006/04/27 3:02, MANTANI Nobutaka wrote: > > nobutaka 2006-04-26 18:02:49 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > textproc/uim Makefile pkg-plist > > textproc/uim-gtk Makefile pkg-plist > > Log: > > Install uim-candwin-gtk from textproc/uim port for uim-xim. > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.2 +1 -1 ports/textproc/uim-gtk/Makefile > > 1.2 +0 -1 ports/textproc/uim-gtk/pkg-plist > > 1.51 +14 -2 ports/textproc/uim/Makefile > > 1.26 +1 -1 ports/textproc/uim/pkg-plist > > This change makes textproc/uim depend on gtk2 unconditionally. > Why not to merge textproc/uim-gtk into textproc/uim? I don't think so. Frequent port merge/split confuses users. -- MANTANI Nobutaka nobutaka@nobutaka.org, nobutaka@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86zmi64obg.wl%nobutaka>