From owner-freebsd-security Fri Feb 9 9:51:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from silby.com (cb34181-c.mdsn1.wi.home.com [24.183.3.139]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4598637EA87 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 09:51:14 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 86492 invoked by uid 1000); 9 Feb 2001 17:51:12 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Feb 2001 17:51:12 -0000 Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 11:51:12 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack To: Szilveszter Adam Cc: Subject: Re: Is this a problem for us too? In-Reply-To: <20010209114758.C6167@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Szilveszter Adam wrote: > -CURRENT and -STABLE have 2.3.0 so they are not vulnerable. 3.x stil > doesn't have OpenSSH at all AFAIK. The ports have just been marked > FORBIDDEN for both ssh and openssh. Something else? No, I think we have > covered all bases:-) > > -- > Regards: > > Szilveszter ADAM > Szeged University > Szeged Hungary Well, marking the ports forbidden doesn't really _fix_ the bug. However, the patch is only one line long, so I imagine the maintainers will have the two ports fixed in a quick hurry. Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message