Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:49:11 +0100 From: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de> To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r411147 - head Message-ID: <56E84B17.3070809@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <201603151339.u2FDdWR8006292@slippy.cwsent.com> References: <201603151339.u2FDdWR8006292@slippy.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2016-03-15 14:39, Cy Schubert wrote: > In message <201603151031.u2FAVrif078706@repo.freebsd.org>, Olli Hauer > writes: >> Author: ohauer >> Date: Tue Mar 15 10:31:53 2016 >> New Revision: 411147 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/411147 >> >> Log: >> - add note for VDA users how to stay on postfix-2.11.x > > Would it not be a good idea to also keep the legacy version of postfix in > the tree for a while? Possibly deprecating it with a best before date? > Is there a special requirement for postfix-3.0.x? At the moment we have 3 versions (+ additional ${port}-sasl) in the tree: postfix-2.11.7 -> mail/postfix211 postfix-3.1.0 -> mail/postfix postfix-3.2.20160314 -> mail/postfix-current Postfix 2.8 was the last official supported version for VDA but the VDA patch also works with 2.11.x 2.11.7 is at the moment the last version from the 2.x line and I don't plan to remove it until it is no longer supported by Wietse (I suspect at last one or more years) I really don't see the need to keep an additional postfix-3.0.x (legacy) port in the tree, but if there are good arguments I can change my mind ;) -- olli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56E84B17.3070809>