From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 10 13:42:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D74B106564A; Tue, 10 May 2011 13:42:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Received: from wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C558FC16; Tue, 10 May 2011 13:42:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4AD52YH063954; Tue, 10 May 2011 08:05:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Message-ID: <4DC937FE.7090602@missouri.edu> Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 08:05:02 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.org, koziol@hdfgroup.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "maho@FreeBSD.org" , thierry@FreeBSD.org Subject: Why so many versions of the port science/hdf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 13:42:17 -0000 Why are there three versions of science/hdf in the ports? This is causing problems for me when I try to build the port octave-forge. As dependencies, it calls in the octave port (which currently defaults to hdf5), the cgnslib port (which uses hdf5-18), and the opendx port (which uses hdf). All of these ports function perfectly well with hdf5.18, because all the different versions of hdf conflict with each other. If we could settle on using hdf5-18 throughout, that would be great. (I currently maintain opendx, so that would be something I can fix.) Are there ports that need hdf but don't build with hdf5-18? Thanks, Stephen