From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jan 21 8:26:16 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8BE37B401 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 08:26:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from wrzx35.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (wrzx35.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de [132.187.3.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133BA43F1E for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 08:26:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from q@uni.de) Received: from wrzx30.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (wrzx30.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de [132.187.1.30]) by wrzx35.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8/uniwue-MM-1.05) with ESMTP id RAA355781 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 17:26:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from virusscan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wrzx30.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41F930585 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 17:26:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from wrzx37.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (wrzx37.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de [132.187.3.37]) by wrzx30.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907B71A920 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 17:26:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from spamchecker (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wrzx37.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7F9A1A2 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 17:26:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from frodo.galgenberg.net (galgenberg.net [132.187.222.250]) by wrzx37.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (Postfix) with SMTP id B4F4E63A1 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 17:26:10 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 20170 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2003 16:26:10 -0000 Received: from gb-007.galgenberg.net (HELO roadrunner) (@132.187.222.7) by galgenberg.net with SMTP; 21 Jan 2003 16:26:10 -0000 Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 17:26:11 +0100 From: Ulrich Spoerlein To: toni@stderror.at Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 5.0-STABLE ??? Message-Id: <20030121172611.3d2f7082.q@uni.de> In-Reply-To: <20030120200112.GA98053@devil.stderror.at> References: <200301192336.h0JNam2r036785@lurza.secnetix.de> <01ad01c2c02c$e84eaf40$0101a8c0@cascade> <20030120032658.GA35779@gforce.johnson.home> <20030120200112.GA98053@devil.stderror.at> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.7) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=8.0 tests=CARRIAGE_RETURNS,IN_REP_TO,NICE_HELO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.42-string_20021002 X-Spam-Level: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 2003/01/20-21:01:12 Toni Schmidbauer wrote: >On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 09:26:59PM -0600, Glenn Johnson wrote: >> So if one decides to make the jump to 5.0 and wants to track >> development, should -CURRENT be tracked or RELENG_5_0? > >-CURRENT > >RELENG_5_0 contains only critical bugfixes and security updates, >as mentioned above. To finally clear things: Where will RELENG_5_1 come from? I guess it will be branched from -CURRENT too? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message