From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 20 00:33:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Received: from localhost (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0AAC16A4CF; Sat, 20 Dec 2003 00:33:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 17:32:48 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20031220.173248.115913656.rushani@FreeBSD.org> To: blackend@FreeBSD.org From: Hideyuki KURASHINA In-Reply-To: <20031220083755.A16685@abigail.blackend.org> References: <200312200723.hBK7Ni5Z062135@repoman.freebsd.org> <20031220083755.A16685@abigail.blackend.org> X-PGP-Public-Key: http://www.bl.mmtr.or.jp/~rushani/rushani.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A052 6F98 6146 6FE3 91E2 DA6B F2FA 2088 439A DC57 X-URL: http://www.bl.mmtr.or.jp/~rushani/ X-Mailer: Mew version 4.0.62 on Emacs 21.3.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/de/platforms pc98.sgml www/en/platforms pc98.sgml www/fr/platforms pc98.sgml www/ja/platforms pc98.sgml www/ru/platforms pc98.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 08:33:31 -0000 Hi, >>> On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 08:37:55 +0100, Marc Fonvieille said: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:23:44PM -0800, Hideyuki KURASHINA wrote: > > rushani 2003/12/19 23:23:44 PST > > > > FreeBSD doc repository > > > > Modified files: > > de/platforms pc98.sgml > > en/platforms pc98.sgml > > fr/platforms pc98.sgml > > ja/platforms pc98.sgml > > ru/platforms pc98.sgml > > Log: > > Update Shibata-san's web page URI due to integration of OCN and DreamNet. > > > > Hey, > > Did you checked if the translated versions were up-to-date before doing > the change? de_DE and ru_RU versions seem to be up-to-date seeing about &reference; and ``Original revision'' in SGML file, respectively. ja_JP one is OK. > In fact you should update the en_US version, Yes. > then let various > translation teams to update their files, this will avoid merging > issues if the translated versions are not based upon the same revision > as the en_US one. Ouch, it is right. I'll consider other translation teams' effort more next time. Sorry. I'll back them out. -- rushani