From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 19 10:09:18 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5484016A4CE; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP
	id ACC7343D46; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie)
Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP
          id <aa98597@salmon>; 19 Apr 2004 18:09:15 +0100 (BST)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 18:09:15 +0100
From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
Message-ID: <20040419170915.GA1089@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
References: <200404190506.i3J56SJW091402@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040419102552.26241E-100000@fledge.watson.org>
	<20040419164919.GC8967@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040419164919.GC8967@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Sender: dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net if_stf.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:09:18 -0000

On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 09:49:19AM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
> Unfortunatly, no.  I've never had much luck finding testers for stf.  It
> doesn't seem to see much use.  I'm making more changes to it then usual
> because it's a special case (only one unit possiable) so it's good for
> simple cloning example code.

I'm using it in a few places, but only on -stable, so that isn't
much good for testing locking changes.

	David.