From owner-freebsd-current Mon Apr 1 09:52:00 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA10130 for current-outgoing; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 09:52:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA10102 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 09:51:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with ESMTP id TAA29660 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 19:51:42 +0200 Received: by sax.sax.de (8.6.11/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id TAA11484 for freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 19:51:42 +0200 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.7.4/8.6.9) id TAA06115 for freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 19:19:59 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199604011719.TAA06115@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: FreeBSD performance vs BSD/OS To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD-current users) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 1996 19:19:58 +0200 (MET DST) In-Reply-To: <199604011057.UAA14960@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Apr 1, 96 08:57:55 pm X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8a] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Bruce Evans wrote: > >Should this become time(9)? > > No, it has very little to do with time or the kernel. clocks(7) would > be better, and half of it is i386-specific so it would need to be split > up. Ok, make it clocks(7). It's not long enough to be split, so it could be kept i386-specific (at least by now). > I don't like section 9. It's far better than no chance to document the kernel at all. We need more people who start documenting the interfaces once they know. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)